Senior legal professional Rizwan Merchant, who has represented Sanjay Dutt prior to now, spoke solely to ETimes sharing his ideas at the on-going investigation and courtroom case that includes Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan. He mentioned, “The Narcotics Control Bureau’s (NCB) operation of search, WhatsApp chats and alleged seizures is a farce. Under the guise of a rave party, they claim to have entered the cruise and made seizures. This is far from the truth. Where does the NCB get finance of raising Rs 20-plus lakhs for purchasing 26 entry passes to the cruise at Rs 80,000 per pass? This is a ridiculous claim. They never entered the cruise. They started frisking and searching guests at the entry point to the cruise. You can’t have a rave party with trance music with just 8 people on the boat. Having allowed 1800 people to leave would mean that none of them had drugs on them. So you can’t have a rave party with just 8 to 10 people.”

He brings up the subject of the CCTV pictures of the cruise send terminal the place Aryan and his pal Arbaaz Merchant had been detained. He says, “Why is it that the NCB feels the need to take charge of the CCTV recordings from the cruise terminals? The truth will be revealed through these CCTV recordings on the cruise terminal as well as on the cruise itself.” Service provider additionally feels that the political faces helping the NCB all the way through the raids raises crimson flags. He says, “The presence of political persons in the search party also raises doubts about the authenticity and genuineness of the entire case.”

The Further Solicitor Normal (ASG) Anil C Singh, all the way through contemporary courtroom court cases has cited the case of Rhea Chakraborty to determine that NDPS offences are non-bailable. Commenting at the veracity of those claims, Service provider says, “In the case of Rhea Chakraborty & others, the NCB initially made a statement that they had disclosed bailable offences and that just 2 days are required for some investigations. Thereafter, they filed their replies to bail applications filed in court. Immediately after 2 days, they appeared in court claiming that it’s a case of financing and that section 27A of the NDPS Act has been applied making the offence non-bailable.” Service provider explains that the similar chronology is being utilized in Aryan Khan’s case. He says, “This is precisely what they’ve done in the case of Aryan, too. Firstly, they claimed that it’s a bailable offence, then disclosed WhatsApp chats etc and claimed that it’s a case of international racketeering and therefore offence has become non-bailable.”

In the end, Service provider expresses his unhappiness and says, “These dishonest tricks belittle the reputation of a prime, Central Government agency, which was essentially formed for targeting drug traffickers and drug peddlers.”

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here