Symbol Supply : PTI

Pakistan courtroom acquits 6 leaders of Hafiz Saeed’s JuD in terror financing case

Six leaders of Hafiz Saeed-led Jamat-ud-Dawah (JuD), the entrance organisation for the proscribed Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), answerable for sporting out the 2008 Mumbai assault, have been acquitted via Pakistan’s Lahore Top Court docket (LHC) on Saturday. The participants have been previous sentenced in reference to a terror-financing case. 

Lashkar-e-Taiba orchestrated the 2008 Mumbai terror assaults that killed greater than 160 other folks.

In step with Break of day, the trial courtroom had sentenced nine-year imprisonment to every Prof Malik Zafar Iqbal, Yahya Mujahid, Nasrullah, Samiullah and Umar Bahadur whilst Hafiz Abdul Rehman Makki have been awarded a six-month prison time period.

“The appellants challenged their conviction before a division bench of the LHC comprising Chief Justice Muhammad Ameer Bhatti and Justice Tariq Saleem Sheikh. Their counsel argued that the prosecution failed to prove the charge against the appellants beyond a reasonable doubt. He said the trial court had not appreciated the evidence properly which had caused the serious miscarriage of justice,” Pakistani media reported.

He argued that the Al-Anfaal Believe, of which the appellants have been participants, had no nexus with the proscribed Lashkar-i-Taiba (LeT).

The recommend contended that there used to be now not a whit of proof that the appellants engaged in any job that supported the targets of the LeT or different such organisation. He stated the appellants had already disassociated them from the agree with long ago within the mid-2000s, Break of day reported.

An extra prosecutor common antagonistic the appeals and argued that the agree with used to be running as a proxy for the LeT owing to which the federal government proscribed it in 2019. He stated the appellants have been trustees/place of business bearers and staunch activists of the agree with.

Permitting the appeals, the department bench observes that the commentary of the primary prosecution witness isn’t dependable as there is not any corroboratory proof, Break of day reported.

“In his cross-examination, Inspector Muhammad Khalid (prosecution witness) conceded that the local police station never received any complaint against the appellants and even during his investigation nobody from the general public brought anything to his notice which could expose their malefactions,” the bench famous.

The bench remarks that it’s trite that the prosecution will have to end up its case past cheap doubt to safe the conviction of an accused.

It maintains, “The appellants cannot be convicted for the mere reason that LeT or the trust have been proscribed,” Break of day reported.

The bench dominated that the prosecution will have to independently identify the components of the offences below sections 11-F and 11-J(2) of the ATA which it has didn’t do.

In the meantime, JuD leader Hafiz Muhammad Saeed and a number of other different leaders were convicted in dozens of FIRs registered via the Counter-Terrorism Division (CTD) on fees of terror financing. The CTD had registered as many as 41 FIRs towards the JuD leaders in several towns, Break of day reported. 

(With inputs from ANI)

Also Read | ‘Baseless propaganda’, says India after Pak links blast near Hafiz Saeed’s Lahore house with RAW

Latest World News

Source link


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here